One of the more controversial areas surrounding Masonry is the oaths of secrecy that Masons are required to swear upon initiation into the various degrees and more specifically, the ritual penalties attached to the breaking of these oaths. This teaching explores these oaths as they to pertain to the first three degrees and beyond! Should any professing Christian swear such oaths?
Whenever it is put to Freemasons that Masonry is a religion, the overwhelming majority take strong objection and insist that Freemasonry is not a religion. If it follows that Freemasonry is a religion, how can a Christian be a member of both the body of Christ and the body of Freemasonry? Indeed as we shall see, Freemasonry is the religion of universalism.
Download the notes for this teaching below
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/6b_Freemasonry_Pt2.pdf
When one thinks of Freemasonry, what thoughts immediately spring to mind? Are they positive thoughts or are they negative thoughts? For some they think of charitable works, good citizens of society, morally upstanding individuals. For others they think of a good old boys club - you scratch my back I’ll scratch yours. For others still, they think of conspiracy, corruption and perjury, a secret society, worshippers of Lucifer! I want from the very start to be clear about the aims of this teaching. It is not my aim to delve into the many fruitless conspiracy theories that abound on the matter via the internet. It is rather my aim to answer one most important question relevant to this teaching on the cults, namely, is Freemasonry compatible with Christianity?
Download the notes for this teaching below
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/6a_Freemasonry_Pt1.pdf
Oneness Pentecostals , in emphasising what it perceives to be holiness, lays great stress on particular outward standards which it terms as ‘standards of holiness’. These standards include the adherence to legalistic codes of conduct such as women not wearing trousers, not cutting their hair, not dying their hair and not using make-up or jewellery. Men are expected to dress in conservative attire, white shirts and dark trousers, hair short and neat and face clean shaven. Alcohol, tobacco and dancing are strictly forbidden. Failure to adhere to these “standards of holiness” may result in dis-fellowship and ultimately to loss of one’s salvation!! This concluding teaching seeks to clearly define what is meant by 'worldliness' so as to contrast it against the definition given by Oneness Pentecostals.
Download notes (pdf)
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5g_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt7.pdf
Jesus Only Pentecostals, aka Oneness Pentecostals derive this name from the position they take concerning baptism. Not only do they hold to the heresy of baptismal regeneration but they hold to an exclusive form of it, namely that baptism by immersion in the formula of “in the name of Jesus” is the only valid formula for baptism. They also hold that unless one is baptised with the Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaks in tongues then one cannot be saved! Once again, we seek to explore these teachings and compare and contrast them with the Bible.
Download notes (pdf)
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5f_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt6.pdf
According to Oneness Pentecostals, the answer to the question ‘what must I do to be saved?’ is not answered with the words of Paul and Silas, ‘Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved’ (Acts 16:31). Rather, they add water baptism in Jesus name as a necessary component for salvation. We explore this ancient heresy known as Baptismal Regeneration and seek through scripture to refute it.
Download notes (pdf)
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5e_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt5.pdf
In answering the Oneness Pentecostals on the issue pertaining to the relationship between Jesus’ humanity and deity, we turn once again to look at early Church history, namely the Council of Ephesus (431 AD) and the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD). We also turn to scripture to address the question...'In what sense did Jesus Christ assumed a physical body and yet at the same time exist as God?' This teaching also seeks to establish the person of the Holy Spirit as it relates to the doctrine of the Trinity.
Finally, we examine some of the famous proof texts used by Oneness Pentecostals to argue in favour of Modalism.
Download notes (pdf)
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5d_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt4.pdf
Oneness Pentecostals outright reject the Triune nature of God and instead take a Unitarian position, namely that God is not only singular in being (Monotheism) but also singular in person. Trinitarianism however stands in direct contrast to Unitarianism and defines God as singular in being yet three in persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This teaching seeks to give a defence of the doctrine of the Trinity over and against that of Modalism.
Download notes (pdf)
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5c_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt3.pdf
2013/14 saw Oneness Pentecostals celebrate their centennial anniversary. However, the heresies that this group holds to regarding the nature of God and the person of Jesus Christ can be traced back much further, to the early beginnings of Christianity in the second and third centuries A.D. Very early on in it's history, the Church of Jesus Christ has had to withstand and refute the heresies of Modalists who denied the Trinity and instead sought to teach that God is only one in relation to His person. This teaching explores that early history and in particular addresses what took place at the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D.
Download the notes for this teaching below
http://traffic.libsyn.com/bethesdashalom/5b_Oneness_Pentecostals_Pt2.pdf